|
9/11 theories: First off, let me just say this... Dear god, I'm gonna get SO much s**t for this if I'm even allowed to post it. Now. Let's start, shall we? If you look at the second tower to fall, in the most famous clip from someone's apartment window it looks like, by the way it's shot, you see that the plane pushes itself HALF WAY THROUGH before any actual damage is done. This brings up the question: "Is it a hologram?" I believe that it very easily could be one, and the hologram is covering up a missile. But then this begs the question: "Why not just attach wings and a tail to a missile? Wouldn't that be cheaper?" I'm not saying yes and I'm not saying no, but I feel that just for the sake of you guys seeing where I'm coming from, I think that the plane was very real, just a LOT more flimsy than it looks. This also explains how they found parts of the plane on the ground below. What still bothers me is the fact that a single plane could NOT bring down a building designed to withstand damn near everything. Also there's NO plane explosion hot enough to be able to melt metal. Twist metal; yes, easily. But melt it? No. If I'm allowed to think here, the metal was separated in at LEAST 1,529 different places on each floor, and as I was saying before; there's NO WAY any explosion from a plane (except a bomb, of course) could melt metal. This could mean that there was melted metal below the towers either when they were built or a few days or hours before they were destroyed. What else bugs me is that there were no markings identified on these planes; they were un-marked, therefore they technically never existed. What BETTER way for there to be as little cover-up as possible then being able to say they belonged to whatever they're rumored to be from. "But Aaron, our government would NEVER put its citizens in danger or purposefully and willingly kill civilians!!!" Is that so? I suppose you've never heard about "Operation Northwoods". Operation Northwoods was a series of false-flag proposals that originated in 1962 within the United States government, and which the Kennedy administration rejected. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of Operation Northwoods was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington." Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated: "The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere." Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy. (I could go on and on with this.) So after reading that, are you still sure that our "brilliant" and "accepting" government that's TOTALLY fair and other bullshit would never kill innocent people? Back to 9/11. You'll also notice that on the first plane to hit, there's a piece of paper that suddenly appears and floats from left to right on the screen milliseconds before it went boom. I highly doubt this has any real significance, but that's not to say there ISN'T a significance to it. "Why would the government do this, though?" Easy. You know where we still are after being promised it'd be a "fast" war or whatever s**t they thrust down your throat? THAT'S RIGHT! Iraq. First thing's first. When they said that Iraq had "weapons of mass destruction" we got there and OH MY!!!! WHAT A SURPRISE!!!! There's no weapons of mass destruction or weapons ******** ANYWHERE here. On the tv when they said Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, Bush or someone held up a small med-bottle filled with a white powder. "OH NO!!!! THEIR WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION IS BUSH'S AFTERNOON COCAINE!!! WE'RE SCREWED!!!!" Yea, real funny, guys. And finally, if you know ANYthing about global oil proportions, you'll know that Iraq is (or at least was) rich in oil. The US was in need of oil. Suddenly Iraq's exporting oil to the US. Suddenly the US has more oil. And yet, there's still no "scary" weapons of "doom" or whatever. And at the wreckage of any plane there's always a "black box" type-thing, right? They never released that to the public, in case you haven't noticed. There's also at least 1000 recordings going through the dis-info bureau, but only TWO OR THREE were released to the public. They easily could've called the "terrorists" middle-eastern/from Iraq just to start a bogus war over there. They could've pre-programmed the planes with a crash course to the towers. This is only my view, please leave your own. UNLESS YOU'RE GONNA BE ALL LIKE "LAWL, YOU STUPID!!! YOU'RE PROBABLY SOME SMELLY HIPPIE OR WHATEVER!!! I'MA GO WATCH FOOTBALL, CONFORM, BUY STUFF I DON'T NEED AND BLEND IN!!!!" d**k faces like that will be deleted immediately. Good day, friends.
|
